Guest Blog: 2011 Climate Recap, USA

Rebecca Anderson is the Team Scientist for the Alliance for Climate Education.  Check out her biography and other blog posts for us here.

    Texas wildfires, September 2011 (Photo courtesy of NASA)

Texas wildfires, September 2011 (Photo courtesy of NASA)

2011 was a year of extremes. Extremes like football player Tim Tebow’s winning streak and Kim Kardashian’s shortest-ever marriage, but also extremes of the weather variety.

Last year, the U.S. got hit with a record-breaking total of 14 weather disasters of over a billion dollars each, from Hurricane Irene to wildfires in Texas to the series of tornado outbreaks last spring. (2008 is the #2 year with only 9 billion-dollar weather disasters.)

The Mississippi River massively flooded in the spring, prompted by heavy rainfall and lots of melting snow in the Midwest. This flood was considered a 100-year event, even though similar floods along the Mississippi have happened several times in the last few decades. Could climate change be at work? The Army Corps of Engineers says, “Possibly, yes.”

At the same time, neighboring Texas endured (and continues to endure) its worst drought in the state’s history. Although rain brought minor relief at the end of the year, much of the southern part of the state is still classified as in an “exceptional” drought. In total, wildfires burned almost 4 million acres (approximately double the previous record in Texas) and over 2,800 homes.

Much of the country, especially the east coast, got slammed with a major heat wave this July, shattering thousands of temperature records, buckling roads and railroads. The high humidity and hot nights made this heat wave especially brutal.

Playing roles behind the scenes in these events are a couple key factors: climate change and La Niña. Was climate change involved? Yes. Climate change plays a role in all our weather events these days. To use an increasingly popular phrase, “We are loading the dice” towards more heat extremes and intense storms as we increase both the heat in the atmosphere as well as the moisture. (Read more here on why climate change brings crazy weather with it.)

La Niña, a cooling of the equatorial Pacific Ocean that affects global weather patterns, also played a role. La Niña was in strong effect last winter and continues in 2012 in a more weakened form. (Think of climate change and La Niña like two directors in a performance, each shaping the outcome of events with sometimes coordinated, sometimes competing directions.) La Niña tends to make global temperatures cooler than average and that proved true in 2011 as well. Preliminary calculations for the year’s average temperature put 2011 as only the 10th hottest year on record, but still warm enough to make it the warmest La Niña year ever. (Check out graph of yearly temperature with Na Niña years marked in blue.)

So now, what is in store for 2012? Being winter in the northern hemisphere, hopefully it will mean snow in the near term, at least more than the zero inches we in northern California have gotten so far this year. For the year as a whole, La Niña is still in the mix, making forecasters predict a slightly warmer year than 2011 but not as hot as the hottest year on record, 2010.

Maybe it is the year when Rebecca Black will record a new hit single, “Turn out the lights – it’s Friday” or the world-famous talking dog will speak up about canines leading the way to a sustainable future. It could happen! Young people will be right there with them.

Guest Blog: Rebecca Anderson

Map showing high levels of dissolved methane in surface water (Courtesy of The Independent online)

Map showing high levels of dissolved methane in surface water (Courtesy of The Independent online)

Rebecca Anderson is the Team Scientist for the Alliance for Climate Education.  Check out her biography and other blog post for us here.

Watch out cows: the Siberian Shelf makes a lot of methane too!

Over the last couple weeks, the climate blogosphere has been lighting up over a recent report that enormous plumes of methane are bubbling to the surface off the coast of eastern Siberia in Russia. (Original article in the Independent online.)

So, what does this mean? It is a lot of methane, to be sure. The discovery was first made in 2010 and estimated at over 7 million tons (roughly equivalent to the methane emissions from the rest of the whole ocean). Now scientists report even more methane coming up, in plumes over a kilometer wide, although they are not estimating exactly how much more yet.

One of the researchers described the plumes in the Independent as “continuous, powerful and impressive seeping structures.” I am imagining a loose strand of gas bubbles rising up through the ocean to the surface, more like scuba diving CO2 emissions than Old Faithful. The authors use the term “ebullition” to describe the process – a new word for me and an instant favorite.

Left unsaid in all this buzz, but nevertheless implied is the worry that human-caused global warming triggered the methane release. Buried deep under the seafloor of the Arctic Ocean is a reservoir of carbon called methane hydrates, methane gas trapped in a cage of ice. Some scientists estimate they hold more carbon than all remaining fossil fuel reserves combined.

IF these things melted and released all their methane, it would be catastrophic for climate change. Methane is more than 20 times as powerful as CO2 and a major contributor to climate change, typically from emissions from livestock and landfills. Could that be what these scientists discovered? Answer: No. Under closer examination, it turns out that although recent climate change has indeed warmed up the Arctic Ocean and a thin layer of the seafloor beneath it, it has not gotten anywhere close to where the methane hydrates lie buried 200 meters below the seafloor. Before human warming began, buried permafrost (permanently frozen mud) started about 25 meters below the seafloor. Now, rising sea temperatures have increased that depth to 26 meters below the seafloor. (A meter’s not a lot, but it’s incredible to me that our CO2 emissions have done anything at all below the floor of the Arctic Ocean—more evidence that the effects of climate change are real and in progress.)

But let’s dig a little deeper (pun intended). Where did these methane hydrates come from in the first place? Are they the source of the methane or not? And if we are not melting them, where are the methane plumes coming from?

I blogged on the mysterious methane hydrate back in April, but they are cool enough (last pun, promise) to warrant a second look. They are sensitive entities that can only exist under cold, high-pressure conditions, such as at or below the seafloor. Because they have got methane in them, you can burn them, which is why their nickname is “fire ice.” The methane inside comes from ancient marine plankton that got buried over time in the mud and decomposed, eventually ending up at just the right temperature and pressure conditions to get trapped within a cage of ice.

Usually, methane hydrates exist 300-500 meters below the seafloor, but in the Arctic, where it is colder, they can exist at shallower depths, around 200 meters. This is what makes them more susceptible to warming. But the same researchers who discovered the plumes of methane calculate that even if humans keep on cranking up the Earth’s thermostat for another 1000 years, we’ll still only defrost the top 75 meters of seafloor, so they seem pretty safe for the time being.

But these methane hydrates are not the only bits of methane buried beneath the ocean. The rest of the permafrost has methane trapped in it, too, even if it is not in the cool form of fire ice. And it appears to be this methane that is the source of the current ebullition.

Prior to 8000 years ago, this part of Siberia was actually land. But as sea level rose after the last ice age, the ocean flooded this part of the coast, putting the land under water, where it has been ever since. The researchers believe that the methane leaking out today is left over from the permafrost adjusting to being submerged by the ocean 8000 years ago.

If this is the case, it brings up some new questions as well: We know where the methane is NOT coming from, but are not any closer to knowing exactly where it is coming from. What depth? (Somewhere below 26 m but above 200 m, I am guessing.) How much is down there? Has the methane always been bubbling up in this part of the Arctic and are scientists just now discovering it? (It is a remote spot for sure and may have eluded detection as a result.) Or is this a new phenomenon and if so, what has changed?

And lastly, what does this mean for climate change? 7 million tons is about 2.5% of global methane emissions, making it a small, but meaningful factor to add to the mix of gases currently warming the planet. Not one that we have much control over, though. For now, it is another reminder that while we know climate change is poised to change human life forever, many of the details keep getting more complicated—and more dire.

Guest Blog: Climate Science That Sticks

Rebecca Anderson, Climate Scientist for ACE (Courtesy Photo)

Rebecca Anderson, Climate Scientist for ACE (Courtesy Photo)

Rebecca Anderson is the Alliance for Climate Education‘s staff climate scientist and a climate educator in California and Nevada. She blogs regularly about climate science and solutions for The Huffington Post and other outlets. Previously, Rebecca conducted climate research on the West Antarctic Ice Sheet ice-core drilling project, studied ice caps on Baffin Island in the Canadian Arctic and worked as an interpretative ranger with the National Park Service. Rebecca holds a Master of Science in geological sciences at the University of Colorado and a Bachelor of Arts in geosciences from Williams College.  Read her guest blog below!

 

I love my job.

Every week I get to visit a nearby high school, get up on stage and present to the students the story of climate change. It’s a story without an ending yet, but that’s a good thing, because then I get to work with the same young people who are writing the end of the story.

I’m an educator and the team scientist for the Alliance for Climate Education (ACE). ACE is the national leader in the United States in climate science education for high school students and has presented our free multimedia assembly on climate science and solutions to more than 1 million students nationwide. I am proud that our assembly is working too—a recent survey with Chicago Public Schools found our assembly contributed to a 58% improvement in climate science understanding, and ACE was awarded the 2011 Climate Change Communicator of the Year Award.

But I was not always in this line of work. I started out wanting to study glaciers, so I could travel to remote and bone-chillingly cold places around the world. And I got to – both to Baffin Island in the Arctic (2 years of research on those ice caps and a Master’s degree told me: “Yep, they’re melting — and fast.”) as well as to Antarctica (not melting quite as fast there yet, thankfully).

The more I travelled and the more I studied, the more I learned that scientists know plenty about climate change. The problem is that most people don’t understand what the scientists know. And because people don’t get how severe the problem is, they don’t care.

That’s when I met ACE. Now, instead of having adventures navigating the frozen wastelands of the Arctic by snowmobile, I explore wilderness like the fearsome hallways of Placer High School when the lunch bell rings. The wildlife is just as interesting.

On stage, I explain the situation with climate change through our multimedia assembly. It is climate science that sticks, filled with fast-paced animations that show students how our lifestyles are increasing greenhouse gases, which in turn are trapping in excess heat and warming up the planet. I also talk about the impacts: more heat waves, intense storms, flooding and droughts, disease, military strife…this is the worst part. But then I invite students to imagine their own end to the story – and to actually step up to make their vision real.

I love this part the best. Because when I finally do wrestle through the crowds in the halls, I step into a classroom filled with the Placer High ACE Action Team: 20 students dedicated to making their school and community greener. In addition to competing with other ACE Action Teams nationwide to use less energy in their school in ACE’s Biggest Loser Energy contest, they’re planning for their annual Placerpalooza festival – a springtime greenfest with solar-powered music, all recyclable and compostable materials and local food and crafts.

Placer High’s club is just one of almost a thousand ACE Action Teams across the country taking on carbon-cutting projects. And people are listening. Last spring, two ACE Youth Reps spoke at the White House about their success in lowering their school’s energy use and saving the school more than $20,000.

These young people aren’t just the future of America’s shift to sustainability. They’re at the heart of that shift right now.